Ron’s #7: Radical by David Platt

Yes, I read and reviewed this last year, but as The Harbor is undergoing a church-wide study on the book, I read it again. I’m counting it!

Our community group is reading and discussing it, and I feel that talking about it with others I’m close to helps in understanding and appreciating Platt’s call for a radical lifestyle. We are able to look into how materialism has crept into our lives, and find ways to avoid having it our master.

I know that some charge Platt with creating a new type of legalism, but that is unfounded. We are too quick to rationalize Jesus’ command to “sell everything that you have and give it to the poor” that we cling with white knuckles the things that are temporary in our lives and do nothing.

You owe it to your faith to read this book and to see how the gospel of Jesus Christ is greater and sweeter than the siren’s song of Madison Avenue.

Ron's #6: Think by John Piper

I'm late on this. Both John and Mark already posted on this book, and I'm sure that readers are not eager to read yet another review for John Piper's Think. Too bad. Here is another one.

Like most of my friends, I'm a fan of John Piper. He has articulated the joy of the Christian faith better than most authors, and that joy rubs off in how I want to live my life for Christ, not in dutiful drudging along, but rather excitement that I get to serve the supremely valuable being in the universe. These two lives look quite different when lived.

Maybe it is because of my great respect for John Piper that caused me to be disappointed in this book on developing a Christian mind. I expected something powerful and breathtaking, but rather I found it, well, boring. Rather than focusing on the parts that I felt were weak, I want to highlight the portion that I thought was excellent.

The strongest part of this book and the one that I will remember is that Piper discusses what it means to "love God with all your mind." For too long, I have thought of this as a reason to use our minds to think about the things of God (which is of course true). However, Piper goes further to show how "our thinking should be wholly engaged to do all it can to awaken and express the heartfelt fullness of treasuring God above all things" (83). Our reading, thinking, discussing, and writing should all have the same aim: to treasure Christ more. While these activities can have secondary ends such as providing others a reason for the faith, for community, for mere enjoyment, etc., the ultimate goal should be to find more ways to love Jesus. This is both convicting and encouraging for me.

We read this in our latest Apologia meeting, and I think that the consensus about the book was similar: some good sections, but perhaps longer than it needed to be. Other books that we've discussed in the past do a better job at tackling relativism, reading, and anti-intellectualism.

Don't worry about this review, Mr. Piper. I'll always be a fan.

Ron’s #5: Meaning at the Movies by Grant Horner

I like books on reading movies through the lens of a Christian worldview. I’m a sucker for Christ figures, evidence of grace, and sin and redemption in the movies. Films give us a common forum in which to discuss the important themes of life with both Christians and non-Christians. At our church, we have a semi-regular Faith & Film night where we screen a movie and discuss the themes. I love this, as it forces us to go beyond merely, “I liked it,” or “The explosions were cool.” Movies are another form of story to interpret, discuss, and enjoy.

My bookshelf has an ever-growing collection of books that help viewers learn how to interpret movies well.  I read one a few years ago that helped me to frame my thinking and discussions. Useless Beauty: Ecclesiastes through the Lens of Contemporary Film by Robert Johnston is still one of my favorites. When I hear of a good book, I’ll buy it, browse through it, and return to Johnston’s work. It’s better than most I’ve read. I was excited to read a review of Grant Horner’s new book, Meaning at the Movies: Being a Discerning Viewer. Horner is an English professor at Master’s College in California, and his book has received good reviews. I was eager to read it, especially after discovering that my friend John Freiberg had Horner as a professor at Master’s. John made a glowing comment about him: “I learned more about theology in that literature class than I learned in my theology classes.” A bold statement, but I understand that stories often teach us much about the world around us.

As a whole, I enjoyed Meaning at the Movies. The strongest parts were the chapters on film noir and the last chapter that discusses memory. I learned much about the genre of film noir, and have a list of movies that I want to watch. I loved his discussion of the connection of the look of black and white with the character’s moral blackness and whiteness. He discusses the darkness of these movies in the happy-go-lucky American consumerism in the 1950s. He has a great contrast of the femme fatales of film noirs with the Ozzy and Harriet housewives. Because of this chapter, I want to watch Sunset Boulevard, The Postman Always Rings Twice, A Touch of Evil, and (perhaps most of all), Scarlet Street. Horner does a great job summarizing the films.

The chapter on memory is titled, “The End of the Matter.” He uses Citizen Kane, Blade Runner, and 2001: A Space Odyssey to examine the role of memory. This chapter alone is worth the book cost. It almost seems as a stand-alone chapter, and I wondered if this was a separate essay or article that he included. He does ruin the “Rosebud” mystery in Citizen Kane, so I suggest that you watch the movie first.

There were aspects of the book that I didn’t enjoy. I don’t want to harp about them, so I’ll briefly state them:

1. Too much of mere summaries of movies and not enough analysis.

2. A 30-page introduction with little to do with movies.

3. Uses a clever line, “All the world’s a screen” more than needed to illustrate his point.

4. Overuses quotations from Ecclesiastes, which was already done in Useless Beauty.

5. Most of all these, he does not clearly help us to be discerning viewers. While I enjoyed the summaries of movies, he did not teach how we can further think about movies.

The bad does not necessarily outweigh the good in the book, but it’s about even. Horner is an excellent writer with clever insight into lots of great movies, but I’m not sure how much I learned about how to discern movies for myself.

I suggest that if you are eager to read about movies and how they intersect with a Christian worldview, begin with Useless Beauty. After that, read the last two chapters of Horner’s book.

Ron’s #4: Ant Farm: and Other Desperate Situations by Simon Rich

I’m not proud of it, but this is my second Simon Rich book in two months. I read the other at the end of 2010. You can read my review here.

Like Free-Range Chickens, Rich has a keen sense of humor that is the perfect mix of pop culture, sarcasm, satire, and goofiness that I love to read. Here is a sampling to see if this book is for you:

war

LT. MCDOUGAL: Who among you will carry the flag as we march into battle?

ABBOT: I will!

LT. MCDOUGAL: And if this man goes down?

WALTER: Then I will hoist up the flag and carry it in his place!

LT. MCDOUGAL: And if this man goes down?

HAROLD: Then …I guess …I will carry the flag, sir!

LT. MCDOUGAL: And if this man goes down?

CHARLES: Then … well … I’ll carry it.

LT. MCDOUGAL: And if this man goes down?

JOHN: Then … me? I guess? I’ll carry it?

LT. MCDOUGAL: And if this man goes down?

WELLINGTON: Geez …I guess, then, I’ll carry it. If it comes to that.

LT. MCDOUGAL: And if this man goes down?

MORTIMER: Sir … what kind of forces are we going up against? I mean …don’t get me wrong, if Wellington takes a hit, I’ll carry the flag—

LT. MCDOUGAL: And when this man goes down?

KEARNY: Sir? What do you think our chances are…of winning this battle? I’m not trying to get negative, I’m just… (Sighs.) Look, I’ll carry the flag if he goes down. I’m just starting to get nervous—

LT. MCDOUGAL: And when this man goes down?

BILLINGS: Jesus. Captain, who are we fighting? What’s the situation? Please, just be straight with us.

LT. MCDOUGAL: Who will carry the flag when Kearny goes down?

BILLINGS: Well, I guess me. I mean, I’d be the only one left … in that scenario. LT. MCDOUGAL: All right. It goes Abbot, Walter, Harold, Charles, John, Wellington, Mortimer, Kearny, and then Billings. Forward march.

If you need a funny book to kill a few hours, this is your author, although I recommend Free-Range Chickens over this one. You'll forget most of the jokes by the next day, but you'll remember that you laughed when you were reading.

Ron’s #3: Unbroken by Laura Hillenbrand

For good reason, Unbroken by Laura Hillenbrand landed on many Best of the Year lists in 2010, including on Mark’s. I’m not sure I would have picked this up otherwise; I like World War II books as much as the next guy (if the next guy in question also likes World War II books), but this is focused on one man. And it’s 500 pages. I wasn’t sure that I was ready to commit.

I’m so glad that I did. After a few pages, I knew that I would love this book. Unbroken is the story of Louie Zamperini, a hooligan-turned-Olympic runner-turned-pilot-turned-prisoner of war-turned- unbroken and hopeful man. That’s a pretty good one-sentence summary of the book, just in case the publisher is looking for a subtitle for the forthcoming paperback version. I liked Louie instantly; he was a troublemaker tough-guy, but found his escape from his California town by running. Introduced to the sport by his brother, Louie runs in high school, college, and then in the 1936 Berlin Olympics where he met Adolph Hitler.

His life changed soon after as the story follows Louie into his new career as an AAC bombardier, until he crashes in the Pacific. Louie and two others survive at sea for over forty days without provisions (with a troubling scene about a lice infestation in his newly grown beard). If the story ended here, it would be a powerful journey. However, it does not. Much of the book is his horrid treatment in several prisoner of war camps in Japan. Just when I thought all the evil happened to Louie, there is a new chapter of horror.

The title is perfect to describe Zamperini. This man personifies courage, resilience, and hope in ways I have never seen. There were times I gasped aloud to read his ordeals. The squalor and suffering only provide a backdrop to allow Louie’s courage and character to shine brightly.

I hesitate to say to much to avoid taking away the suspense as you read it, but allow me to say that Louie continues to sink lower into despondency and hopeless until God intervenes. In literature, it’s called deux ex machina; in life, it is called redemption.

This book also has much to say about the many Japanese atrocities in World War II, whether it is in prison camps, Pearl Harbor, or Nanking:

The Japanese military surrounded the city of Nanking, stranding more than half a million civilians and 90,000 Chinese soldiers. The soldiers surrendered and, assured of their safety, submitted to being bound. Japanese officers then issued a written order: ALL PRISONERS OF WAR ARE TO BE EXECUTED. What followed was a six-week frenzy of killing that defies articulation. Masses of POWs were beheaded, machine-gunned, bayoneted, and burned alive. The Japanese turned on civilians, engaging in killing contests, raping tens of thousands of people, mutilating and crucifying them, and provoking dogs to maul them. Japanese soldiers took pictures of themselves posing alongside hacked-up bodies, severed heads, and women strapped down for rape. The Japanese press ran tallies of the killing contests as if they were baseball scores, praising the heroism of the contestants. Historians estimate that the Japanese military murdered between 200,000 and 430,000 Chinese, including the 90,000 POWs, in what became known as the Rape of Nanking.

This gives a more complete picture of the behavior and the attitudes of Japan, and why Hiroshima and Nagasaki were last resorts. Japan was on par of the atrocities committed by Hitler and Germany, and the two countries had more in common during treatment of people during the war than they differed. This concept certainly is not in our modern psyche. It is accepted (and often applauded) to denigrate Germany, but it is labeled as racist if we criticize Japan.

In addition to the highlighting of a great man and as a history lesson, Unbroken is simply excellent prose. Hillenbrand has a poetic style of writing even the cruelest events.

Examples:

He felt as if he would faint, but it wasn’t from the exertion. It was from the realization of what he was.

One engine, for reasons known only to the plane, was thirstier than the others, so the gauges had to be watched constantly

There was one perk to life in the barracks. The bathroom was plastered in girlie pinups, a Sistine Chapel of pornography.

But it was good to feel oriented, to know that they were drifting toward land somewhere out there, on the far side of the earth’s tilt.

Dignity is as essential to human life as water, food, and oxygen. The stubborn retention of it, even in the face of extreme physical hardship, can hold a man’s soul in his body long past the point at which the body should have surrendered it. The loss of it can carry a man off as surely as thirst, hunger, exposure, and asphyxiation, and with greater cruelty. In places like Kwajalein, degradation could be as lethal as a bullet.

The paradox of vengefulness is that it makes men dependent upon those who have harmed them, believing that their release from pain will come only when they make their tormentors suffer.

Whether or not you are a fan of war accounts, go read this book. Like me, you will be mesmerized with Louie Zamperini for good reason. He is a man who stands above other men, and his story demands to be told. The more like Zamperini we are, the better the world would be.